July 11, 2008

Friday, July 11, 2008
“Percentage of CT readers.” What is that, 28 people? Actually, as Squashed points out, it should say, “Percentage of CT readers who responded to an online poll.” So, more like 9 people. Ok, enough snark. To be fair, CT notes the number of votes for each date ranging from 1500 - 3200 and warns, “take the polls with a grain of salt”. However, online polls are notoriously, uh, worthless.

Nevertheless I think we can make 2 observations from this data:


people are sheep.
Christians never liked Hillary very much.

(via squashed)

“Percentage of CT readers.” What is that, 28 people? Actually, as Squashed points out, it should say, “Percentage of CT readers who responded to an online poll.” So, more like 9 people. Ok, enough snark. To be fair, CT notes the number of votes for each date ranging from 1500 - 3200 and warns, “take the polls with a grain of salt”. However, online polls are notoriously, uh, worthless.

Nevertheless I think we can make 2 observations from this data:

  1. people are sheep.
  2. Christians never liked Hillary very much.

(via squashed)

Quick, name the fastest growing city in California? San Jose? Riverside? San Diego? Nope, nope and nope.
 
The state’s fastest growing city over 100,000 population between July 1, 2006, and July 1, 2007, says the Census Bureau, was — drumroll, please — Victorville in the so-called “high desert” northeast of Los Angeles. In fact, it was the second fastest growing city in the nation at 9.5 percent.
California Political Columnist - Dan Walters: California by the Numbers
 
Heh, Victorville in the SacBee (a so-called “newspaper”)

Helpful

A blind gentleman, complete with white cane, asked me for directions just now. Of course, I pointed in the direction he should go. Anything I can do to help.